(PDF) 6 Referências Bibliográficas - DBD PUC RIO · 6 Referências Bibliográficas ACKERMAN, B. Social Justice and the Liberal State. New Haven: Yale ... HUME, David. An Enquiry concerning - DOKUMEN.TIPS (2024)

(PDF) 6 Referências Bibliográficas - DBD PUC RIO· 6 Referências Bibliográficas ACKERMAN, B. Social Justice and the Liberal State. New Haven: Yale ... HUME, David. An Enquiry concerning - DOKUMEN.TIPS (1)

6 Referências Bibliográficas ACKERMAN, B. Social Justice and the Liberal State. New Haven: Yale

University Press, 1980.

_____________. We the People: Foundations. Cambridge: Harvard University

Press, 1991.

AFFICHARD, Joëlle & FOUCAULD, Jean-Baptiste. (dir.) Justice Sociale et

Inégalités. Paris: Éditions Esprit, 1992.

_____________. (dir.) Pluralisme et Équité – La Justice Sociale dans les

Démocraties. Paris: Éditions Esprit, 1995.

ALEXANDER, L. (Ed.). Constitutionalism – Philosophical Foundations.

Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1999.

ALEXY, Robert Teoría de los derechos fundamentales. Trad. Ernesto G.

Valdés. Madrid: Centro de Estudios Constitucionales, 1993.

_____________. On Balancing and subsumption: a structural comparison. Ratio

Juris, v. 16, n.4, 2003.

APEL, K.-O. 'Normative Ethics and Strategic Rationalíty: the Philosophic

Problem of a Polítical Ethic'. In: The Graduate Faculty Philosophy

]ournal, voI. 9, pp. 81-107, 1982.

_____________. Discussion et Responsabilité. Paris: Editions du Cerf, 1996.

AUDARD, C. (ed.) Individu et Justice Sociale. Autour de John Rawls. Paris:

Editions du Seuil, 1988.

ÁVILA, Humberto. Teoria dos Princípios da definição à aplicação dos

princípios jurídicos. São Paulo: Ed. Malheiros, 2004.

BACHOF, Otto. Jueces y constitución. Trad. Rodrigo B. Rodríguez-Cano.

Madrid: Ed. Civitas, 1987

BAIER, K. 'Justice and the Aims of Polítical Philosophy'. In: Ethics, voI. 99, pp.

771- 90, 1989.

BALKIN, J. Some Realism about Pluralism: Legal Realist Approaches to the First

Amendment. Duke Law Journal, 375, 1990.

DBD

PUC-Rio - Certificação Digital Nº 0220909/CA

(PDF) 6 Referências Bibliográficas - DBD PUC RIO· 6 Referências Bibliográficas ACKERMAN, B. Social Justice and the Liberal State. New Haven: Yale ... HUME, David. An Enquiry concerning - DOKUMEN.TIPS (2)

162

BARROSO, Luís Roberto. Fundamentos teóricos e filosóficos do novo Direito

Constitucional brasileiro (pós-modernidade, teoria crítica e pós-

positivismo). IN: A nova Interpretação Constitucional. Rio de Janeiro:

Renovar, 2003

BARRY, Brian. The Liberal Theory of Justice. A Critical Examination of the Principal

Doctrines in A Theory of Tustice by John Rawls. Oxford: Clarendon Press,

1973.

_____________. Theories of Justice. A Treatise on Social ]ustice. London:

Harvester-Wheatsheaf, 1989.

_____________. Justice as Impartiality. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press, 1995.

BAYNES, Kenneth. The Normative Grounds of Social Criticism: Kant,

Rawls, Habermas. New York: State University of New York Press, 1992.

BEINER, Ronald & BOOTH, William. (ed.) Kant & Political Philosophy – The

contemporary legacy. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1993.

BENHABIB, Seyla. 'The methodological illusions of modem polítical theory: The

case of Rawls and Habermas'. In: Neue Hefte für Philosophie, voI. 21, pp. 47-

74, 1982.

BENHABIB, S. e DALLMAYR, F. (eds.) The Communicative Ethics Controversy.

Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1990.

BENHABIB, Seyla (ed.) Democray and Difference – Contesting the

Boundaries of the Political. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1996.

BERNSTEIN, Richard. The New Constellation – The Ethical- Political

Horizons of Modernity/Postmodernity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press,

1992.

BERTEN, André, SILVEIRA, Pablo e POURTOIS, Hervé (eds.) Libéraux et

Communautariens. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1997.

BIDET, Jacques. John Rawls et la théorie de la justice. Paris: Presses

Universitaires de France, 1995.

BINENBOJM, Gustavo. A nova jurisdição constitucional brasileira:

legitimidade democrática e instrumentos de realização. Rio de Janeiro:

Renovar, 2001.

BLOCKER, H. G. e SMITH, E. (eds.) John Rawls' Theory of Social ]ustice. An

Introduction. Athens: Ohio University Press, 1980.

DBD

PUC-Rio - Certificação Digital Nº 0220909/CA

(PDF) 6 Referências Bibliográficas - DBD PUC RIO· 6 Referências Bibliográficas ACKERMAN, B. Social Justice and the Liberal State. New Haven: Yale ... HUME, David. An Enquiry concerning - DOKUMEN.TIPS (3)

163

BOBBIO, Norberto. Direito e Estado no Pensamento de Emanuel Kant.

Brasília : Ed. Universidade de Brasília, 1984.

BOBBIT, Philip. Constitutional Fate – Theory of the Constitution. Oxford,

UK: Oxford University Press, 1982.

BONAVIDES, Paulo. Curso de Direito Constitucional. São Paulo : Ed.

Malheiros, 2003.

_____________. Jurisdição constitucional e legitimidade (alguma

observações sobre o Brasil). São Paulo. Estudos Avançados 18 (51), 2004.

BORGES, Maria de Lourdes, DALL’AGNOL, Darlei, DUTRA, Delamar

Volpato. Ética. Rio de Janeiro: Dp&A editora, 2003.

BOURETZ, P. (ed.) La force du droit. Panorama des débats contemporains. Paris:

Editions Esprit, 1991.

BRINK, D. O. Moral Realism and the Foundations of Ethics. Cambridge:

Cambridge University Press, 1991.

BROADIE, Sarah, Ethics with Aristotle. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 1991.

CAMARGO, Margarida Maria Lacombe. Hermenêutica e Argumentação –

Uma Contribuição ao Estudo do Direito. Rio de Janeiro: Renovar,

2003

CAMPBELL, T. ]ustice. Atlantic HigWands: Humanities Press International,

1990.

CANOTILHO, J.J. Direito Constitucional e teoria da constituição. 2ed.

Coimbra: Almedina, 1998.

CARBONELL, Miguel (ed.) Neoconstitucionalismo(s) Madrid: Ed. Trotta, 2003.

CARNOIS, Bernard. La cohérence de la doctrine kantienne de la liberté. Paris:

Ed. Du Seuil, 1973.

CASSIRER, Ernst. Kant´s life and Thought, New Haven: Yale University,

1981.

CATTONI, Marcelo. (cood.) Jurisdição e Hermenêutica Constitucional. Belo

Horizonte: Mandamentos, 2004.

CAVALIER, R., GOUINLOCK, L e STERBA, J. (eds.) Ethics in the History of

Western Philosophy. New York: St Mart:in's Press, 1989.

CHAUI, Marilena. Introdução à Filosofia – Dos pré-socráticos a Aristóteles.

Vol I. São Paulo, Cia das Letras, 2000.

CHOMSKY, Noam. 'A Review of B. F. Skinner's Verbal Behavior'. In: Language,

DBD

PUC-Rio - Certificação Digital Nº 0220909/CA

(PDF) 6 Referências Bibliográficas - DBD PUC RIO· 6 Referências Bibliográficas ACKERMAN, B. Social Justice and the Liberal State. New Haven: Yale ... HUME, David. An Enquiry concerning - DOKUMEN.TIPS (4)

164

voI. 35, pp. 26-58, 1959.

CITTADINO, Gisele. Pluralismo, Direito e Justiça Distributiva – Elementos

da Filosofia Constitucional Contemporânea. Rio de Janeiro: Editora

Lúmen Júris, 2000.

CLAYTON, Cornell. “Law, Politics, and the Rehnquist Court: Structural

Influences on Supreme Court Decision Making”. In: GILLMAN, Howard &

CLAYTON, Cornell (ed.) The Supreme Court in American Politics –

New Institutionalist Interpretations. Lawrence, KA: University Press of

Kansas, 1999

COLEMAN, J.L. AR. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy

703, 1991.

CORLETT, J. A. (ed.) Equality and Liberty: Analyzing Rawls and Nozick. New

York: St. Mart:in's Press, 1991.

COTTERRELL, R. The Politics of Jurisprudence. A Criticallntroduction to Legal

Philosophy. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1989.

CRITIQUE - Numéro Spécial- n. 505-506. John Rawls, Justice et Libertés, 1989.

CULLITY, Garrett & GAUT, Berys. Ethics and Practical Reason. Oxford:

Claredon Press, 1997.

DANIELS, Norman. 'Reflective Equilibrium and Archimedean Points'. In:

Canadian Journal of Philosophy, vol. 19, pp. 83-103, 1980.

_____________. (ed.) Reading Rawls – Critical Studies on Rawls “A Theory

of Justice”. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1989.

DUARTE, Fernanda & VIEIRA, José Ribas. Teoria da mundança

constitucional – sua trajetória nos Estados Unidos e na Europa. Rio de

Janeiro: Renovar, 2005.

DWORKIN, Ronald. Sovereign Virtue – The Theory and Practice of

Equality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press,

_____________. 'Justice and Rights'. In: Dworkin, R. Taking Rights Seriously.

Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, pp. 150-183, 1977.

_____________. Levando os Direitos a sério. São Paulo: Ed. Martins Fontes,

2002.

_____________. O direito da liberdade. A leitura moral da Constituição

norte-americana. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2006

DBD

PUC-Rio - Certificação Digital Nº 0220909/CA

(PDF) 6 Referências Bibliográficas - DBD PUC RIO· 6 Referências Bibliográficas ACKERMAN, B. Social Justice and the Liberal State. New Haven: Yale ... HUME, David. An Enquiry concerning - DOKUMEN.TIPS (5)

165

_____________. Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University

Press, 1977.

_____________. (ed.) The Philosophy of Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press,

1991.

_____________. The Court and the University. The New York Review, Mai 15,

2003.

ELKIN, S. L. & SOLTAN, K. E. (Ed.) A New Constitutionalism – Designing

Political Institutions for a Good Society. Chicago: The University of

Chicago Press, 1993.

ELY, John Hart. Democracia y Desconfianza Una teoría del control

constitucional. Santafé de Bogotá: Siglo del Hombre Ed., 1997.

ETHICS - Symposium on Rawlsian Theory of Justice: Recent Developments, vol. 99,

pp. 694-914, 1989.

FISK, M. The State and Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.

_____________. (ed.) Justice. Key Concepts in Critical Theory. New Jersey:

Humanities Press, 1993.

FORST, Rainer. Contexts of Justice – Political Philosophy beyond Liberalism

and Communitarianism. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press,

2002.

FREEMAN, Samuel. (ed.) John Rawls: Collected Papers. Cambridge, MA:

Harvard University Press, 1999.

GARGARELLA, Roberto. La Dificultad de Defender el Control Judicial de las

Leyes. In: Isonomia N. 6 – Abril, 1997

GAUTHIER, D. Moral Dealing: Contract, Ethics and Reason. Ithaca: Comell

University Press, 1990.

GILLMAN, Howard & CLAYTON, Cornell (ed.) The Supreme Court in

American Politics – New Institutionalist Interpretations. Lawrence, KA:

University Press of Kansas, 1999.

GOYARD-FABRE, Simone. Kant et le Problème du Droit. Paris: Lib.

Philosophique J. Vrin, 1975

GRIFFIN, Stephen M. American Constitutionalism – From Theory to Politics.

Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1996.

DBD

PUC-Rio - Certificação Digital Nº 0220909/CA

(PDF) 6 Referências Bibliográficas - DBD PUC RIO· 6 Referências Bibliográficas ACKERMAN, B. Social Justice and the Liberal State. New Haven: Yale ... HUME, David. An Enquiry concerning - DOKUMEN.TIPS (6)

166

_____________. Judicial Supremacy and Equal Protection in a Democracy of

Rights. In: University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law, Vol.

4, N. 2, 2002.

GUCHET, Y. Histoire des Idées Politiques. Tome I. Paris: Armand Colin,

1995.

GUCHET, Y. & DEMALDENT, J.-M. Histoire des Idées Politiques. Tome II.

Paris: Armand Colin, 1996.

GUENTHER, K. The Sense of Appropriateness. Trad. J. Farrell. Albany: State

University of New York Press, 1993.

GUTMANN, A. & THOMPSON, D. Moral Conflict and Political Consensus.

101 Ethics 64, 1990.

_____________. Democracy and Disagreement. Cambridge: Harvard

University Press, 1996.

HÄBERLE, Peter. El estado constitucional. México: Unam, 2003.

HABERMAS, Jürgen. On the Logic of the Social Sciences. Trad. S. Nicholsen

& J. Stark. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1988.

_____________. Morale et Communication. Conscience Morale et Activité

Communicationelle. Trad. C. Bouchindhomme. Paris: Editions du Cerf,

1991.

_____________. De l’Ethique de la Discussion. Trad. M. Hunyadi. Paris:

Editions du Cerf, 1992.

_____________. Direito e Moral. Lisboa: Instituto Piaget, 1992.

_____________. Between facts and norms. Contributions to a Discourse

Theory of Law and Democracy. Trad. W. Rehg. Cambridge: MIT Press,

1996.

_____________. La paix perpétuelle – Le bicentenaire d’une idée kantienne.

Paris: Ed. du CERF, 1996.

_____________. Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action.

Cambridge, MA: Mit Press, 1996.

HABERMAS, J. & RAWLS, J. Debat sur la Justice Politique. Trad. R.

Rochlitz. Paris: Editions du Cerf, 1997.

HALL, Kermit. (ed.) The Oxford Companion to the Supreme Court of the

United States. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 1998

HART, H. L. A. The Concept of Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1961.

DBD

PUC-Rio - Certificação Digital Nº 0220909/CA

(PDF) 6 Referências Bibliográficas - DBD PUC RIO· 6 Referências Bibliográficas ACKERMAN, B. Social Justice and the Liberal State. New Haven: Yale ... HUME, David. An Enquiry concerning - DOKUMEN.TIPS (7)

167

_____________. 'Rawls on Liberty and its Priority'. In: Daniels, N. (ed.) Reading

Rawls. Critical Studies on Rawls' A Theory of Tustice. Stanford: Stanford

University Press, 1989.

_____________. The Concept of Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992.

HELLER, A. Beyond Justice. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1987.

HESSE, Konrad. A força normativa da Constituição. Porto Alegre : Fabris

Editor, 1991.

HOFFE, O. 'Dans quelle mesure Ia théorie de John Rawls est-elle kantienne?'

Trad. B. Schwegler. In: Audard, C. (ed.) Individu et Justice Sociale. Autour de

John Rawls. Paris: Editions du Seuil, pp. 54-71, 1988.

_____________. La Justice Politique. Trad. J. C. Mede. Paris: PUF, 1991.

_____________. Prindpes du Droit. Ethique, Théorie Juridique et Philosophie

Sociale. Trad. J. C. Merle. Paris: Les Editions du CERF, 1993.

HONNETH, Axel. The Fragmented World of the Social – Essays in Social and

Political Philosophy. New York: State University of New York Press, 1995.

HUGUES, G. (ed.) Law, Reason and Justice. Essays in Legal Philosophy. New York:

New York University Press, 1989.

HUME, David. An Enquiry concerning the Principles of Morals. Oxford:

Oxford Univ. Press, 1998.

JONAS, Hans. Le principe responsabilité – une éthique pour la civilisation

technologique. Paris: Ed. du Cerf, 1990.

KAY, Richard S. American Constitutionalism. In: ALEXANDER, L. (Ed.).

Constitutionalism – Philosophical Foundations. Cambridge, UK:

Cambridge University Press, 1999, p. 17 a 63.

KANT, Emmanuel. Critique de la raison pratique. In: Oeuvres Philosophiques

Vol II Paris: Gallimard, bibliothèque de la plêiade, 1980.

_____________. Critique de la raison pure In: Oeuvres Philosophiques. Vol I

Paris: Gallimard, bibliothèque de la plêiade, 1980.

_____________. Fondements de la Metaphysique des Moeurs In: Oeuvres

Philosophiques. Vol II Paris: Gallimard, bibliothèque de la plêiade, 1980.

_____________. Métaphysique des Moeurs In: Oeuvres Philosophiques. Vol III

Paris: Gallimard, bibliothèque de la plêiade, 1980.

_____________. Oeuvres Philosophiques, vols. I, II & III. Paris: Gallimard,

bibliothèque de la plêiade, 1980.

DBD

PUC-Rio - Certificação Digital Nº 0220909/CA

(PDF) 6 Referências Bibliográficas - DBD PUC RIO· 6 Referências Bibliográficas ACKERMAN, B. Social Justice and the Liberal State. New Haven: Yale ... HUME, David. An Enquiry concerning - DOKUMEN.TIPS (8)

168

_____________. Réponse à la question: qu’est-ce que les Lumières? In:

Oeuvres Philosophiques. Vol II Paris: Gallimard, bibliothèque de la plêiade,

1980.

_____________. Sur le Lieu Commun: il se peut que ce soit juste en théorie,

mais, en pratique, cela ne vaut point In: Oeuvres Philosophiques. Vol III

Paris: Gallimard, bibliothèque de la plêiade, 1980.

_____________. Fondements de Ia Métaphysique des moeurs. Trad. V. Delbos.

Paris: J. Vrin, 1988.

KELL Y, M. (ed.) Hermeneutics and Critica I Theory in Ethics and Politics.

Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1991.

KELSEN, Hans. Jurisdição Constitucional. Trad. Alexandre Krug. São Paulo:

Martins Fontes, 2003

KIRCHHEIMER, O. Political ]ustice: the Use of Legal Procedure for Political Ends.

Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1961.

KRIEGER, J. (ed.) The Oxford Companion to Politics. Oxford: Oxford University

Press, 1993.

KOHLBERG, L. 'Justice as Reversibility'. In Laslett, P. e Fishkin, J. (eds.)

Philosophy, Politics and Society. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1979.

KUKA THAS, C. e PETTIT, P. Rawls: A Theory of Tustice and its Critics. Stanford:

StanfordUniversity Press, 1990.

LARMORE, Charles. The Morals of Modernity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge

University Press, 1996

LUCAS, J. On ]ustice. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1980.

LYONS, D. Ethics and the Rule of Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,

1989.

_____________. 'Nature and Soundness of the Contract and Coherence

Arguments'. In: Daniels, N. (ed.) Reading Rawls. Critical Studies on Rawls' A

Theory ofTustice. Stanford: Stanford University Press, pp. 141-167, 1989.

_____________. Moral Aspects of Legal Theory - Essays on Law,]ustice and Political

Responsibility. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.

LYRA FILHO, Roberto. O que é direito. São Paulo: Ed. Brasiliense, 1985.

MAIA, Antonio C. A distinção entre fatos e valores e as pretensões

neofrankfurtianas. In: id. et al. (orgs). Perpectivas atuais da Filosofia do

Direito. Rio de Janeiro: Lúmen Júris, 2005

DBD

PUC-Rio - Certificação Digital Nº 0220909/CA

(PDF) 6 Referências Bibliográficas - DBD PUC RIO· 6 Referências Bibliográficas ACKERMAN, B. Social Justice and the Liberal State. New Haven: Yale ... HUME, David. An Enquiry concerning - DOKUMEN.TIPS (9)

169

_________________. et al. (orgs) Perpectivas atuais da Filosofia do Direito.

Rio de Janeiro: Lúmen Júris, 2005

MINDA, G. Postmodern Legal Movements – Law and Jurisprudence at

Century’s End. New York: New York University Press, 1995

MacINTYRE, A. After Virtue. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press,

1981.

_____________. Whose ]ustice? Which Rationality? Notre Dame: University of

Notre Dame Press, 1988.

McMURRIN, Sterling (ed.) Liberty, Equality and Law. Salt Lake City:

University of Utah Press, 1987.

MERLE, Jean-Christophe. Justice et Progrès. Paris: Presses Universitaires de

France, 1997.

MILL, John Stuart. On Liberty. New York: Penguin Books, 1984.

MORRIS, C. (ed.) The Great Legal Philosopher. Selected readings in jurisprudence.

PhiIadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1991.

MOUFFE, C. 'Rawls: Polítical Philosophy Without Politics'. In: Philosophy and

Social Criticism, voI. 13, pp. 105-124, 1987.

_____________. 'American Liberalism and its Critics. Rawls, Taylor, Sandel and

Walzer'. In: Praxis International, voI. 8, pp. 193-206, 1988.

MULHALL, Stephen e SWIFT, Adam (eds.) Liberal & Communitarians.

Oxford, Uk: Blackwell Publishers, 1992.

MURPHY JR., C. Descent into Subjectivity: Studies of Rawls, Dworkin and Unger in

the Context of Modern Thought. Wolfeboro: Longwood, 1990.

MURPHY, J. e COLEMAN, J. Philosophy of Law. An Introduction to ]urisprudence.

Boulder: Westview Press, 1990.

NAGEL, Thomas. 'Rawls on Justice'. In: The Philosophical Review, voI 82, pp. 220-

234, 1973.

_____________. Equality and Partiality. New York: Oxford University Press,

1991.

NARVESON, J. The Libertarian Idea. Philadelphia: Temple University Press,

1988.

NEAL, P. 'In the Shadow of the General Will: Rawls, Kant and Rousseau on the

Problem of Polítical Righe. In: The Review of Politics, voI. 49, pp. 389-409,

1987.

DBD

PUC-Rio - Certificação Digital Nº 0220909/CA

(PDF) 6 Referências Bibliográficas - DBD PUC RIO· 6 Referências Bibliográficas ACKERMAN, B. Social Justice and the Liberal State. New Haven: Yale ... HUME, David. An Enquiry concerning - DOKUMEN.TIPS (10)

170

NIELSEN, K. e SHINER, R.A. (eds.) New Essays on Contract Theory. Canadian

Journal of Philosophy, Supplementary Volume III, Guelph: Canadian

Association for Publishing in Philosophy, 1977.

NOZICK, R. Anarchy, State and Utopia. New York: Basic Books, Inc. Publíshers,

1974.

O’NEILL, Onora. Towards Justice and Virtue – A Construtive Account of

Practical Reasoning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1996.

PATEMAN, Carole. The Problem of Political Obligation – A Critique of

Liberal Theory. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1979.

PEIXINHO, Manoel Messias, GUERRA, Isabella Franco, NASCIMENTO

FILHO, Firly (orgs) Os princípios da Constituição de 1988. Rio de

Janeiro: Lúmen Júris, 2001.

PETTIT, P. Judging Justice: An Introduction to Contemporary Political Philosophy.

London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1980.

POGGE, Thomas. Kant’s Theory of Justice. Kant-Studien, 79,4: 407-433.

_____________. Realizing Rawls. Ithaca: ComeU University Press, 1989.

POST, Robert C. Constitutional Domains – Democracy, Community,

Management. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press,

POZZOLO, Susanna. Un Constitucionalismo ambiguo. In: CARBONELL,

Miguel. Neoconstitucionalismo(s) Madrid: Ed. Trotta, 2003.

RAKOWSKI, E. Equal Justice. New York: Oxford University Press, 1991.

RASMUSSEN, David.(ed.) Universalism vs. Communitarianism –

Contemporary Debates in Ethics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1990.

RAWLS, John. 'Outline of a Decision Procedure for Ethics'. In: The Philosophical

Review, voI. 60, pp. 177-197, 1951.

_____________. 'Justice as Faimess'. In: The Philosophical Review, voI. 67, pp.

164-194, 1958.

_____________. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of

Harvard University Press, 1971.

_____________. Théorie de Ia Justice. Trad. C. Audard. Paris: Editions du Seuil,

1987. (Texto revisto e modificado pelo autor, em 1975, para as traduções

em línguas estrangeiras).

_____________. 'Kantian Constructivism in Moral Theory'. In: The 1980 John

Dewey Lectures at Columbia University. The Journal of Philosophy, voI. 77,

DBD

PUC-Rio - Certificação Digital Nº 0220909/CA

(PDF) 6 Referências Bibliográficas - DBD PUC RIO· 6 Referências Bibliográficas ACKERMAN, B. Social Justice and the Liberal State. New Haven: Yale ... HUME, David. An Enquiry concerning - DOKUMEN.TIPS (11)

171

pp. 515-572, 1980.

_____________. 'The Basic Liberties and Their Priority'. In: McMurrin, Sterling

M. (ed.) Liberty, Equality, and Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,

pp. 1-87,1982.

_____________. Justice as fairness: political not metaphysical. In: Philosophy

and Public Affairs, vol. 14, 3, 1985.

_____________. 'The Priority of Right and Ideas of the Good'. In: Philosophy and

Public Affairs, voI. 17, pp. 251-276, 1988.

_____________. Justiça como eqüidade: uma concepção política, não

metafísica. In: Lua Nova, n° 25, 1992.

_____________. Justice et Démocratie. Trad. C. Audard, P. de Lara, F. Piron et A.

Tchoudnowsky. Paris: Editions du Seuil, 1993.

_____________. Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press,

1993.

_____________. O Liberalismo Político. São Paulo: Editora Ática, 2000.

RAZ, Joseph. The Morality of Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986.

_____________. 'The Claims of Reflective Equilibrium'. In: Codett, J. A. (ed.)

Equality and Liberty: Analyzing Rawls and Nozick. New York: St. Martin's

Press, pp. 110-135, 1991.

_____________. On the Authority and Interpretation of Constitutions: Some

Preliminaries. In: ALEXANDER, L. (Ed.). Constitutionalism –

Philosophical Foundations, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press,

1999. p.153 a 193

RECANATI, François (dir.) L’Âge de la Science – Lectures Philosophiques 1

Éthique et Philosophie Politique. Paris: Editions Jacob, 1988.

REIMAN, J. Justice and Modern Moral Philosophy. New Haven: Yale University

Press, 1990.

RENAUT, Alain. Philosophie du Droit. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France,

1991.

_____________. Qu’est-ce que le Droit?. Paris: J. Vrin, 1992.

_____________. L’Individu. Paris: Hatier, 1995.

_____________. Kant aujourd’hui. Paris: Aubier, 1997.

REVORIO, Francisco Javier Diaz. La constitución como orden abierto. Madrid:

Estúdios, 1997.

DBD

PUC-Rio - Certificação Digital Nº 0220909/CA

(PDF) 6 Referências Bibliográficas - DBD PUC RIO· 6 Referências Bibliográficas ACKERMAN, B. Social Justice and the Liberal State. New Haven: Yale ... HUME, David. An Enquiry concerning - DOKUMEN.TIPS (12)

172

REVUE DE MET APHYSIQUE ET DE MORALE - Numéro SpéciaI. John

Rawls, Le Politique. n. 1, 1988.

RIALS, S. 'Sur Rawls: les lumieres tardives'. In: Oroits, voI. 6, pp. 143-152, 1987.

RICOEUR, P. 'John Rawls: de l'autonomie morale à Ia fiction du contrat social'.

In: Ricoeur, P. Lectures 1. Autour du Politique. Paris: Editions du Seuil, pp.

196-215, 1991.

_____________. 'Le cerc1e de Ia démonstration'. In: Ricoeur, P. Lectures 1. Autour

du Politique. Paris: Editions du Seuil, pp. 216-230, 1991.

_____________. Lectures 1. Autour du Politique. Paris: Editions du Seuil, 1991.

RILEY, P. Will and Political Legitimacy. A Critical Exposition of Social Contract

Theory in Hobbes, Locke, Rousseau, Kant, and Hegel. Cambridge, Mass.:

Harvard University Press, 1982.

ROSEN, A. D. Kant's Theory of Justice. Ithaca: Comell University Press, 1993.

ROUSSEAU, J. J. Du Contrat social ou Principes du droit politique. In: Rousseau,

J.J. Oeuvres Completes, L'Intégrale, vol lI, Paris: Editions du Seuil, pp. 518-

584, 1971.

_______________. Do Contrato Social. Trad. Lourdes S. Machado. São Paulo :

Ed. Nova Cultural, 1991

ROSENBLUM, Nancy & POST, Robert. (eds.) Civil Society and Government.

Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2002.

SANDEL, Michael (ed.) Liberalism and its Critics. New York: New York

University Press, 1984.

_____________. Liberalism and the Limits of Justice. Cambridge, UK:

Cambridge University Press, 1982.

SAMPAIO, José A. Leite. A Constituição Reinventada pela jurisdição

constitucional. Belo Horizonte: DelRey, 2002.

SAGER, Lawrence G. Juez y democracia. Una teoría de la práctica

constitucional norteamericana. Madrid: Marcial Pons, Ediciones jurídicas

y sociales, 2007

SARAT, Austin & VILLA, Dana. Liberal Modernism and Democratic

Individualit George Kateb and Practices of Politics. Princeton: Princeton

University Press, 1996

SARLET, Ingo Wolfgang (org.) Direitos fundamentais sociais : estudos de

direito constitucional, internacional e comparado. Rio de Janeiro :

DBD

PUC-Rio - Certificação Digital Nº 0220909/CA

(PDF) 6 Referências Bibliográficas - DBD PUC RIO· 6 Referências Bibliográficas ACKERMAN, B. Social Justice and the Liberal State. New Haven: Yale ... HUME, David. An Enquiry concerning - DOKUMEN.TIPS (13)

173

Renovar, 2003.

SARMENTO, Daniel & GALDINO, Flavio. (ed.) Direitos Fundamentais –

Estudos em Homenagem ao Professor Ricardo Lobo Torres. Rio de

Janeiro : Renovar, 2006.

SARMENTO, Daniel. Direitos Fundamentais e Relações Privadas. Rio de

Janeiro: Lúmen Júris, 2004

_________________. Os princípios constitucionais e o pós-positivismo. In:

SARMENTO, Daniel. Direitos Fundamentais e Relações Privadas. Rio

de Janeiro: Lúmen Júris, 2004

SCHAEFER, D. L. 'A Critique of Rawls' Contract Doctrine'. In: The Review of

Metaphysics, voI. 28, pp. 89-115, 1974.

SCHAUER, Frederick. Playing by the Rules – A Philosophical examination of

rule-based decision-making in Law and in Life. Oxford, UK: Clarendon

Press, 1991.

SCHMIDT, James. (ed.) What is Enlightenment? Berkeley, CA: University of

California Press, 1996.

SEBOK, A. Legal Positivism in American Jurisprudence. Cambridge, UK:

Cambridge University Press, 1998.

SEVE, R. 'John Ralws et la philosophie politique'. In: Audard, C. (ed.) Individu et

Justice Sociale. Autour de John Rawls. Paris: Editions du Seuil, 1988.

SHKLAR, J. The Faces of Justice. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1990.

SILVA, José Afonso da. Curso de Direito Constitucional Positivo. 23ed. São

Paulo: Ed Malheiros, 2004.

SMITH, T. The Role of Ethics in Social Theory. Essays from a Habermasian

Perspective. New York: State University of New York Press, 1991.

SOUZA NETO, Cláudio Pereira & SARMENTO, Daniel. A

constitucionalização do Direito – Fundamentos Teóricos e Aplicações

Específicas. Rio de Janeiro: Lúmen Júris, 2007.

SOUZA NETO, Cláudio Pereira. Jurisdição Constitucional, Democracia e

Racionalidade Prática. Rio de Janeiro: Renovar, 2002.

_____________________________. Teoria Constitucional e Democracia

Deliberativa – Um estudo sobre o papel do direito na garantia das

condições para a cooperação na deliberação democrática. Rio de

Janeiro: Renovar, 2006.

DBD

PUC-Rio - Certificação Digital Nº 0220909/CA

(PDF) 6 Referências Bibliográficas - DBD PUC RIO· 6 Referências Bibliográficas ACKERMAN, B. Social Justice and the Liberal State. New Haven: Yale ... HUME, David. An Enquiry concerning - DOKUMEN.TIPS (14)

174

STEINBERGER, P. 'A fallacy in Rawls's Theory of Justice'. In: The Review of

Politics voI. 51, pp. 55-90, 1989.

STRAUSS, L. e CROPSEY, J. (eds.) History of Political Philosophy. Chicago:

Chicago University Press, 1987.

STRECK, Lênio Luiz. Jurisdição constitucional e hermenêutica: uma nova

crítica do direito. Rio de Janeiro: Forense, 2004.

SULLIVAN, Roger J. Immanuel Kant’s Moral Theory. Cambridge, UK:

Cambridge University Press, 1989.

SUMMER, L. W. 'Rawls and the Contract Theory of Civil Disobedience'. In:

Nielsen, K. e Shiner, R. A. (eds.) New Essays on Contract Theory, Canadian

Journal of Philosophy, Supplementary Volume III, Guelph: Canadian

Association for Publishing in Philosophy, pp. 1-48, 1977.

SUSTEIN, Cass R. Designing Democracy. What Constitutions Do? New York,

NY: Oxford University Press, 2001

______________. One Case at a Time: Judicial Minimalism on the Supreme

Court.

TAYLOR, Charles. Philosophical Papers, vaI II - Philosophy and the Human Sciences.

New York: Cambridge University Press, 1985.

_____________. 'The Nature and Scope of Distributive Justice'. In: Taylor, C.

Philosophical Papers. vaI. II - Philosophy and the Human Sciences. New York:

Cambridge University Press, pp 289-317, 1985.

_____________. La Liberté des Modernes. Paris: Presses Universitiares de

France, 1997.

TERRÉ, F. Prefácio de Individu et Justice Sociale. Autour de John Rawls. Aaudard,

C. (ed.) Paris: Editions du Seuil, pp. 9-20, 1988.

THE LAW SCHOOL. The Supreme Court Review. Chicago: The University of

Chicago Press, 2002.

TRIBE, Laurence & DORF, Michael. On Reading the Constitution. Cambridge

MA: Harvard University Press, 1991.

TUGENDHAT, E. Problemas de Ia Ética. Trad. J. Vigil. Barcelona: Editorial

Crítica, 1988.

TUSHNET, Mark. Taking the Constitution Away from the Courts. Princeton:

Princeton University Press, 1999.

VAN PARI]S, P. Qu'est-ce qu'une Socíété ]uste? Introduction à Ia Pratique de Ia

DBD

PUC-Rio - Certificação Digital Nº 0220909/CA

(PDF) 6 Referências Bibliográficas - DBD PUC RIO· 6 Referências Bibliográficas ACKERMAN, B. Social Justice and the Liberal State. New Haven: Yale ... HUME, David. An Enquiry concerning - DOKUMEN.TIPS (15)

175

Philosophie Politique. Paris: Editions du Seuil, 1991.

VIEIRA, José Ribas. (org.) Temas de constitucionalismo e democracia. Rio de

Janeiro: Renovar, 2003.

VILLEY, M. Philosophie du Oroit. voI. I: Oéfinitions et Fins du Oroit. Paris: Dalloz,

1986.

VITA, A. de. 'A Tarefa Prática da Filosofia Política em John Rawls'. In: Lua Nova

- Revista de Cultura e Política, n. 25. São Paulo: Cedec, pp. 5-24, 1992.

WALZER, Michael. Spheres of Justice – A Defense of Pluralism and

Equality. Basic Books, 1983.

_____________. On Toleration. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1997.

WARNKE, Georgia. Justice and Interpretation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press,

1993.

WHITTINGTON, K. Constitutional Construction. Divided Powers and

Constitutional Meaning. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1999.

WILSON, J. American Constitutional Conventions: The Judicially

Unenforceable Rules that Combine with Judicial Doctrine and Public

Opinion to Regulate Political Behavior. 40 Buff. L. Rev. 645, 1992.

WOLFF, R. P. Understanding RawIs. A Recconstruction and Critique of ATheory

ofTustice. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1977.

WOLGAST, E. The Demands of Public Reason. 94 Colum. L. Rev. 1936, 1994.

WRIGHT, C. (Ed). The Fragmented World. Essays in Social and Political

Philosophy. Axel Honneth. Trad. C. Wright. New York: State University

of New York, 1995.

YOLTON, J. W. (Ed). The Blackwell Companion to the Enlightenment.

Cambridge: Blackwell Publishing Inc., 1991.

ZAGREBELSKY, G. El derecho dúctil. Ley, derechos, justicia. Madrid: Ed. Trotta, 1995.

DBD

PUC-Rio - Certificação Digital Nº 0220909/CA

(PDF) 6 Referências Bibliográficas - DBD PUC RIO · 6 Referências Bibliográficas ACKERMAN, B. Social Justice and the Liberal State. New Haven: Yale ... HUME, David. An Enquiry concerning - DOKUMEN.TIPS (2024)

FAQs

What is the liberal theory of social justice? ›

The most well known theory of liberal justice is that of John Rawls' 'justice as fairness'. In A Theory of Justice, Rawls (1999) devises a contractarian notion of justice meant not to define what justice is but to establish moral principles that would be just for the basic structure of society.

What is the concept of social justice? ›

United Nations. “Social justice is the view that everyone deserves equal economic, political and social rights and opportunities. Social workers aim to open the doors of access and opportunity for everyone, particularly those in greatest need.”

What do liberals believe in? ›

Liberals espouse various and often mutually warring views depending on their understanding of these principles but generally support private property, market economies, individual rights (including civil rights and human rights), liberal democracy, secularism, rule of law, economic and political freedom, freedom of ...

What did Rawls believe in? ›

In A Theory of Justice, Rawls defends a conception of “justice as fairness.” He holds that an adequate account of justice cannot be derived from utilitarianism, because that doctrine is consistent with intuitively undesirable forms of government in which the greater happiness of a majority is achieved by neglecting the ...

What is the libertarian theory of social justice? ›

The basis of libertarian justice is rooted in natural rights. Natural rights doctrine understands that all individuals hold inherent rights as humans, which exist outside of and before rights deriving from the laws of political society.

What are the three theories of social justice? ›

Broadly speaking, principles of social justice are of three general types: procedural, redistributive/compensatory, and distributive. Principles pertaining to procedural justice concern the fairness of the process for determining what is just, independent of the outcome.

What do liberals believe about social rights? ›

The fundamental liberal ideals of freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom of religion, the separation of church and state, the right to due process, and equality before the law are widely accepted as a common foundation of liberalism.

What is the liberal social contract theory? ›

The liberal position on the social contract derives almost entirely from the pioneering work of John Locke (1690). John Locke argued that individuals consent to be governed. This consent may be tacit; in that it is not formally expressed, but consent exists and is provided to the government.

References

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Duncan Muller

Last Updated:

Views: 6183

Rating: 4.9 / 5 (79 voted)

Reviews: 94% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Duncan Muller

Birthday: 1997-01-13

Address: Apt. 505 914 Phillip Crossroad, O'Konborough, NV 62411

Phone: +8555305800947

Job: Construction Agent

Hobby: Shopping, Table tennis, Snowboarding, Rafting, Motor sports, Homebrewing, Taxidermy

Introduction: My name is Duncan Muller, I am a enchanting, good, gentle, modern, tasty, nice, elegant person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.