Monroe Capital: The Risks Are Still Too Excessive To Go Long (NASDAQ:MRCC) (2024)

Monroe Capital: The Risks Are Still Too Excessive To Go Long (NASDAQ:MRCC) (1)

In December last year, I wrote an article on Monroe Capital (NASDAQ:MRCC) outlining three specific reasons why investors should, in my opinion, avoid investing in this BDC.

These reasons were the following:

  1. Low margin of safety in the dividend coverage.
  2. One of the highest leverage profiles in the BDC space.
  3. Clear signs of deteriorating portfolio quality.

Back then, in light of expectations on falling interest rates and an increased distress in the corporate segment, investing in a BDC, which embodies an abnormal risk profile did not seem reasonable.

However, since the publication of my bearish article, MRCC has actually outperformed the BDC market.

A major driver behind this dynamic has been the positive systematic or beta movement in the overall BDC space, where such aspects as strengthening of higher for longer scenario and lower corporate distress levels have introduced tailwinds for almost all BDCs. In such "risk on" market conditions, riskier companies with high leverage tend to outperform the more defensive players.

Another factor that we have to take into account when assessing MRCC's performance and its current attractiveness is the Q1 2024 earnings results, which reveal some interesting data points.

Let's now review the Q1 report in detail to determine whether there have been any major changes in MRCC's fundamentals that would now justify assuming a more bullish stance on this BDC.

Thesis review

All in all, the Q1 2024 quarter brought suboptimal results, leaving the question of MRCC's dividend sustainability open.

In Q1, MRCC registered a decrease in the underlying NAV of $0.10 per share, or roughly 1% compared to the prior quarter. The 1.1% decline was mostly driven by the fact that MRCC distributed all of its adjusted net investment income in dividends and had to record an unrealized loss of certain portfolio companies due to struggling credit performance.

The key metric, which measures MRCC's ability to accommodate the dividends and leave some cash at the BDC to cover incremental growth (or maintain a cash flow buffer) - the adjusted net investment income - came in lower by $0.01 per share than in Q4 2023. This decrease was attributable to a reduction in average investment and average invested asset size over the period, coupled with the build-up of non-accrual positions.

As we can see in the table below, MRCC's dividend coverage has fallen back to 100% level, which implies that there is no margin of safety left.

Interestingly, while the cash flows have decreased, MRCC's leverage has continued to tick higher. During the quarter, MRCC's debt to equity increased from 1.49x (which was already excessively high) to 1.6x. This now makes MRCC the fourth most leveraged BDC out there (with the sector average being 1.15x).

Speaking of leverage, it is also important to underscore that from the currently outstanding borrowings of ~$322 million, $130 million are based on a fixed rate, where the cost of financing level is materially below the market level rate (i.e., the fixed rate is 4.75%). The maturity date for this fixed rate financing is 2026, which at the time of refinancing will most likely expand MRCC's interest cost component (unless interest rates/SOFR drop to below 2% territory).

On top of deteriorating cash flow profile and increasing leverage, MRCC was forced to put incremental positions under the non-accruals, representing circa 1.1% of the total portfolio value. With this, the total non-accrual position for MRCC has reached 2.1% of the portfolio value, which is more or less in line with what is typically observed across the BDC landscape.

With that being said, in the most recent earnings call Mick Solimene - CFO & Chief Investment Officer, Corporate Secretary - still painted a positive picture around MRCC's ability to cover the dividend on a forward basis:

When considering current leverage levels, the interest rate environment in the favorable percentage of our at a fixed rate, we believe that on a run rate basis, our adjusted net investment income will continue to cover our current $0.25 per share quarterly dividend, all other things being equal.

The bottom line

In a nutshell, after dissecting Q1 2024 earnings report it is clear that the recent run-up in MRCC's share price has not been so much driven by the fundamentals as by the general beta factor that has lifted the overall BDC market higher (e.g., strengthening of higher for longer scenario and lower corporate distress levels).

There are four specific factors at the fundamental end, which together fully justify a decision to still avoid investing in MRCC:

  1. Adjusted net investment income is on a decline.
  2. The leverage profile has gone from bad to worse.
  3. The dynamics at the non-accrual front are not encouraging.
  4. There is no margin of safety for MRCC's ability to cover the dividends in a sustainable manner.

Finally, in the context of the embedded margin of safety (or rather lack of it), we have to also keep in mind that the presence of so abnormal leverage imposes an additional layer of risk in terms of magnifying any slightest struggle (or cash flow drop) in the underlying business operations.

So, the combination of excessive leverage, no safety buffer, and negative portfolio dynamics, in my opinion, makes Monroe Capital a suboptimal investment choice.

Roberts Berzins, CFA

Roberts Berzins has over a decade of experience in the financial management helping top-tier corporates shape their financial strategies and execute large-scale financings. He has also made significant efforts to institutionalize REIT framework in Latvia to boost the liquidity of pan-Baltic capital markets. Other policy-level work includes the development of national SOE financing guidelines and framework for channeling private capital into affordable housing stock. Roberts is a CFA Charterholder, ESG investing certificate holder, has had an internship in Chicago board of trade (albeit, being resident and living in Latvia), and is actively involved in "thought-leadership" activities to support the development of pan-Baltic capital markets.

Analyst’s Disclosure: I/we have no stock, option or similar derivative position in any of the companies mentioned, and no plans to initiate any such positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Seeking Alpha's Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.

Monroe Capital: The Risks Are Still Too Excessive To Go Long (NASDAQ:MRCC) (2024)

References

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Terrell Hackett

Last Updated:

Views: 5660

Rating: 4.1 / 5 (72 voted)

Reviews: 95% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Terrell Hackett

Birthday: 1992-03-17

Address: Suite 453 459 Gibson Squares, East Adriane, AK 71925-5692

Phone: +21811810803470

Job: Chief Representative

Hobby: Board games, Rock climbing, Ghost hunting, Origami, Kabaddi, Mushroom hunting, Gaming

Introduction: My name is Terrell Hackett, I am a gleaming, brainy, courageous, helpful, healthy, cooperative, graceful person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.